Will this USB-C cable actually work?
Same connector, different capabilities. What the published standards say, and where the answer stops being determined by the plug.
Documentary traces
Real questions people actually ask, each followed through the documents, positions, and decisions its record holds — and ending where the record ends. Every number and quote below traces back to a specific record. Where the record stops short of a fact, the case says so rather than filling the gap.
LAW & AI
The New York Times sued OpenAI over copyrighted articles. What did the court actually decide?
Open the case →LEGAL RESEARCH
The Holmes/Balwani case cites a Ninth Circuit ruling. What exact document does Counterpedia hold, and how do we know?
Open the case →SOURCE TRACING
A Theranos record cites an SEC enforcement filing. Wikipedia helped identify it — but who actually went and got it?
Open the case →AI ACCOUNTABILITY
GPT-5.2 was asked to research using governed sources. It searched and fetched them every time — and returned zero of the structured citations expected in those runs.
Open the case →Start reading
Same connector, different capabilities. What the published standards say, and where the answer stops being determined by the plug.
A grocery-shelf label with a governed definition behind it — and the gap between what the definition requires and what a bottle on the shelf actually carries.
Object identity across catalogues, loans and renumbering — traced through the records rather than assumed from the label.
A posted rule, the rules it inherits from, and what determines which one actually applies at a given curb.
A species renamed and resplit across taxonomy versions — the same animal under changing published authority.
An airliner grounded worldwide for nearly two years after two fatal crashes. Follow the record back to the source material it carries.
Follow a trace
Each trace starts from a question someone actually asks and follows it through the documents, positions, and decisions its record holds. Where the record stops, the trace says so. The traces differ in how far their records go, and each is labelled accordingly.
LAW & AIDocumentary trace
A complaint, a public fair-use position, and a procedural ruling, held side by side without one being made to support the others.
The question
Did the court hold that OpenAI's training on New York Times works was lawful fair use?
What the record carries
The New York Times's pleaded allegation — a contested claim in the pleadings, not an established fact.
OpenAI's public fair-use position — its own stated position, recorded with unknown status, not an independent finding.
Judicial treatment — the court did not address this question in this record, and the record draws no claim-support links between these sources.
Registered sources
The documents themselves. Listed as registered sources, not as support for any particular statement above.
Intake posture
Admitted to Counterpedia's own record under its intake authority. No DAGR decision applies to this historical admission and no SRS receipt exists. A pinned structural verification report is available; authenticity and signature are recorded as not evaluated. Transition to an external authority is a named, pending step.
What remains unresolved
The Times's allegation is a pleaded claim, not a proven fact. OpenAI's public statement is its own position, not an independent finding. The judicial ruling is procedural (a Rule 12(b)(6) motion-to-dismiss disposition), not a merits ruling on fair use. This record does not assert that any one of these three supports or contradicts another.
SOURCE TRACINGSource trail
An SEC enforcement filing behind a Theranos record: who identified it, who retrieved it, and why those are different acts.
LEGAL RESEARCHRecord inspection
Captured bytes and their hash, with authenticity and signature recorded as not evaluated. Possession is not interpretation.
Every case is collected under Cases.
Boundaries
A trace is not an article with footnotes, and it is not one story. It keeps each document, position, and decision distinct, and it keeps the record’s limits visible. Holding a document is not the same as verifying it. Finding a citation is not the same as checking it. Each record says which of those it actually did.
How far a trace goes
Behind it
A source is captured, research is proposed against it, a record is admitted or refused, and the result can be inspected independently. Each step is kept distinct, and none of them is assumed from the one before it.
Inspect what was established, what was not established, and what was never evaluated — then follow the retained evidence and receipt.
Browse admitted, refused, reconsiderable, and terminal branches. A refusal means declined to admit, not proved false.
Follow the record to its sources, history, and recorded limits. If no governed connection exists, no guessed substitute is shown.