CounterpediaExplore knowledge. Follow the sources.
NO-S02Canonical identity resolved

OpenAI public fair-use statement

This page reverses the citation: it shows how a source is carried into the admitted NYT/OpenAI record, which exact retained capture is associated with it, and the boundary on what that relationship establishes.

Record role

defendant position

OpenAI's public position (NO-S02), captured via an archived Wayback Machine edition; not a live-origin observation and not independent corroboration. Whether the described training conduct qualifies as fair use is a live, unresolved legal question.

Bound content block
no-s02-quote
Attribution
OpenAI, "OpenAI and journalism," archived via Wayback Machine (capture 2024-05-10)
Claim-support refs in admitted composition
0

Retained research capture

Acquisition source id
src_53079fce32c24f74a1d5ef9ceaf947eb
Capture id
cap_1f62835c-8eaf-4035-9f25-45a32edca9fb
Captured bytes
sha256:f886a23fe9ad8c3…9afd90392b
Capture receipt
sha256:ac034837e0a7f60…6d009b0d82

Archived Wayback capture; this is not presented as a live-origin observation.

Open captured/public source ↗

What this establishes

  • The admitted record references this exact semantic source ref.
  • A retained Acquisition capture is associated with that ref by the displayed research binding, with exact capture and digest facts preserved.
  • A committed governed crosswalk resolves the displayed Counterpedia↔Acquisition source identity.
  • The admitted record carries the semantic source ref as the defendant's archived public position, bound to the identified content block.

What this does not establish

  • A retained research capture association is not by itself a governed canonical source-identity crosswalk.
  • Source presence or quotation is not a ClaimSupportEdge and does not itself establish factual truth.
  • Exact captured bytes do not establish source authenticity or signature validity.
  • An unresolved Counterpedia↔Acquisition crosswalk does not mean the retained source is absent.
  • Carrying the archived public statement does not independently verify the defendant's position.

Continue through the record

Back to the full NYT/OpenAI record →Read the case question →Test the graph connection →Find other OpenAI records →
Inspect source-bound authority context
Semantic source ref
source:nyt-openai:no-s02-defendant-statement
Canonical identity state
RESOLVED
Admission authority over record consequence
counterpedia.intake-authority/v1

The admission authority shown here governs the admitted record consequence. It is not presented as source authority, source authenticity, or canonical source-identity authority.

Associated entries

1 associated entry

Association is not the same as citation, support, admission, or verification. A corpus target listed here has been judged by a governed owner-class writer to materially belong to that entry’s documentary record, on a stated documentary role and relevance basis. It does not establish, confirm, cite, or back any statement made in that entry, and it carries no admission, standing, or authenticity finding.