CounterpediaExplore knowledge. Follow the sources.
NO-S01Canonical identity resolved

The New York Times complaint

This page reverses the citation: it shows how a source is carried into the admitted NYT/OpenAI record, which exact retained capture is associated with it, and the boundary on what that relationship establishes.

Record role

plaintiff allegation

Pleaded allegation from the plaintiff's complaint (NO-S01); not an established fact. The underlying litigation is ongoing and this allegation has not been adjudicated on the merits.

Bound content block
no-s01-quote
Attribution
The New York Times Company v. Microsoft Corporation and OpenAI, S.D.N.Y., ECF No. 1 (Complaint)
Claim-support refs in admitted composition
0

Retained research capture

Acquisition source id
src_619a0013128462ad7a01a2cec82b4529
Capture id
cap_be2d93a3-553f-4c09-bb02-f0406d8bf9ea
Captured bytes
sha256:5eb30edbdedf0af…241572ea53
Capture receipt
sha256:ce26f1536271643…54be4a775a
Open captured/public source ↗

What this establishes

  • The admitted record references this exact semantic source ref.
  • A retained Acquisition capture is associated with that ref by the displayed research binding, with exact capture and digest facts preserved.
  • A committed governed crosswalk resolves the displayed Counterpedia↔Acquisition source identity.
  • The admitted record carries the semantic source ref as a plaintiff allegation, bound to the identified content block.

What this does not establish

  • A retained research capture association is not by itself a governed canonical source-identity crosswalk.
  • Source presence or quotation is not a ClaimSupportEdge and does not itself establish factual truth.
  • Exact captured bytes do not establish source authenticity or signature validity.
  • An unresolved Counterpedia↔Acquisition crosswalk does not mean the retained source is absent.
  • Carrying the complaint does not establish the pleaded allegation as fact.

Continue through the record

Back to the full NYT/OpenAI record →Read the case question →Test the graph connection →Find other OpenAI records →
Inspect source-bound authority context
Semantic source ref
source:nyt-openai:no-s01-plaintiff-complaint
Canonical identity state
RESOLVED
Admission authority over record consequence
counterpedia.intake-authority/v1

The admission authority shown here governs the admitted record consequence. It is not presented as source authority, source authenticity, or canonical source-identity authority.

Associated entries

1 associated entry

Association is not the same as citation, support, admission, or verification. A corpus target listed here has been judged by a governed owner-class writer to materially belong to that entry’s documentary record, on a stated documentary role and relevance basis. It does not establish, confirm, cite, or back any statement made in that entry, and it carries no admission, standing, or authenticity finding.