CounterpediaExplore knowledge. Follow the sources.

/sources / TH-S09-SRC-0001

Counterpedia Source

Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)

Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim.

Original host route not yet governedfiling

At a glance

What Counterpedia knows

Original source access
Unavailable · no governed source producer binding
Counterpedia public exposure
public registry visibility · Unavailable · exposure decisions not supplied
Publisher / origin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Source family
Law & Public Authority
Currentness
Unavailable · no governed public src1 binding

Host routing

Origin, repositories, and archives

Publisher / origin: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (origin authority)

No governed repository route is attached.

Why Counterpedia shows this

Context around the source

This source is addressable in Counterpedia because it is present in the public Source Registry. Registry visibility, documentary association, retained custody, and claim support remain separate governed facts.

Admitted records citing this source

1

Associated entries

—

Evidence relationships

Claim relationships

Only governed Claim → SourceEdition → SourceRecord relationships appear here. Scores, confidence, independence, and truth are not computed by this page.

Unavailable · no general committed adj1 binding registry

Versions & history

Explicit editions and lifecycle

Unavailable · no governed public src1 binding

Discovery & access

Reader access and discovery provenance

Reader access observations

Reader access is not recorded for this source.

Discovery lineage

Discovery provenance is not recorded for this source.

Counterpedia holdings

Retained material and observations

Retained bytes are custody facts. They do not grant original-host access or public display permission.

retained capture associated · content available · 1 observation

Capture & provenance

What was captured, as recorded

These are facts recorded with the capture. A recorded capture address is not a governed original-source route, and nothing here names a publisher or origin.

Recorded capture address
Not recorded in the public data for this source
Capture id / referent id
urn:counterpedia.source-reference:sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee:TH-S09
Captured bytes digest
sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee
Retention note
Captured via counterpedia-acquisition HttpFetcher (arcs-amnesiac PR #124). ARCS Verify full_artifact_chain.v0_1 passed; authenticity_verified and signature_verified are not_evaluated per arcs-verify design. Bytes: 360184.

Record editions

Editions of the records that cite this source

These are editions of the Counterpedia record, not editions of the source itself. Source editions appear under Versions & history only where a governed source edition exists.

  • TH-S09-ED-0001 · edition 1 of record TH-S09 · released 2026-08-19T00:00:00Z · current edition

Passages

Passages recorded from this source

  • TH-S09-SPAN-0001 · record TH-S09

    Recorded text (declares itself an editorial paraphrase, not a quotation)

    Editorial paraphrase: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order and amended opinion in December 2025 addressing the consolidated criminal appeals of two defendants convicted in connection with a blood-testing company. This span is a neutral summary, not a verbatim quotation of the opinion.

    Verification:
    Unverified: not checked against the captured source
    Location in source:
    No locator recorded for this passage
    Record fragment id:
    TH-S09-FRAG-0001 (record-internal id, not a position in the source)
    Used in record section:
    th-s09-overview

Reader view of this source

Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)

Source

Source type
filing

Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim.

Publication status: public

No supporting claim in loaded material

No supporting claim is present in the material loaded for this view.

Applies to loaded material only

Based on: Applies only to the material loaded for this view; it is not a statement about the whole record.

includes source

  • Incoming from U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Order and Amended Opinion, United States v. Holmes and Balwani (Captured Public Document) · Record

    This record lists this source among the sources it carries.

    Technical details
    machine_predicate
    projects_as
    plane
    governed_semantic
    edge_id
    ["projects_as","[\"record\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09\"]","[\"source\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SRC-0001\"]"]
    artifact_family
    page_model
    artifact_identity
    TH-S09
    source_field
    record.sources
    source_index
    0
    declared_reference
    TH-S09-SRC-0001
    predicate_ref
    garpedia:graph:predicate:projects_as
    • ["projects_as","[\"record\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09\"]","[\"source\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SRC-0001\"]"]

cites

  • Incoming from Editorial paraphrase: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order and amended opinion in December 2025 addressing the consolidated criminal appeals of two defendants convicted in connection with a blood-testing company. This span is a neutral summary, not a verbatim quotation of the opinion. · Relevant passage

    This passage explicitly names this source as the place it comes from.

    Technical details
    machine_predicate
    cites
    plane
    governed_semantic
    edge_id
    ["cites","[\"citationSpan\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SPAN-0001\"]","[\"source\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SRC-0001\"]"]
    artifact_family
    page_model
    artifact_identity
    TH-S09
    source_field
    record.citation_spans[0].source_id
    declared_reference
    TH-S09-SRC-0001
    predicate_ref
    garpedia:graph:predicate:cites
    • ["cites","[\"citationSpan\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SPAN-0001\"]","[\"source\",\"counterpedia-public\",\"TH-S09-SRC-0001\"]"]
Technical details
ref
["source","counterpedia-public","TH-S09-SRC-0001"]
stable_ref
TH-S09-SRC-0001
kind
source
plane
governed_semantic
source_fields
capture_hash, capture_integrity, description, label, publication_status, slug, source_id, source_type, span_ids
raw_codes
Source type code: filing; Publication status code: public
provenance
artifact_family=page_model, artifact_identity=TH-S09, declared_reference=TH-S09-SRC-0001, plane=governed_semantic, predicate_ref=garpedia:graph:predicate:projects_as, source_field=record.sources; artifact_family=page_model, artifact_identity=TH-S09, declared_reference=TH-S09-SRC-0001, plane=governed_semantic, predicate_ref=garpedia:graph:predicate:cites, source_field=record.citation_spans[0].source_id
node_id
["source","counterpedia-public","TH-S09-SRC-0001"]
node_kind
source
source_plane
governed_semantic
Raw machine material
source.capture_hash
sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee
source.capture_integrity
{"capture_referent":{"referent_id":"urn:counterpedia.source-reference:sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee:TH-S09","referent_kind":"external_document","referent_note":"Captured via counterpedia-acquisition HttpFetcher (arcs-amnesiac PR #124). ARCS Verify full_artifact_chain.v0_1 passed; authenticity_verified and signature_verified are not_evaluated per arcs-verify design. Bytes: 360184."},"integrity_class":"captured_bytes"}
source.description
Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim.
source.label
Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)
source.publication_status
public
source.slug
ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-capture
source.source_id
TH-S09-SRC-0001
source.source_type
filing
source.span_ids
["TH-S09-SPAN-0001"]

Observed citations

Citation spans

1 span across records that cite this source.

  • Unverified (verification state): 1

Cited by admitted records

Profile admission boundaries

  • Admitted as a read-only presentation of an independently captured public appellate opinion with a recorded provenance chain. Presentation does not establish authenticity, signature validity, or verification outcome.

Anchor resolution

  • Anchor resolution not applicable: 1

Check against this source

No source URL is available for automatic prefill. Nothing runs until you press Run Check.

This source has no checkable public web address in the published record (it is registered or retained without one), so the Check form opens empty. You can paste a URL and the claim you want to test yourself.

Open Check without prefill →

Source Atlas wayfinding

Classification & institutions

These are presentation relationships only. They do not change documentary identity, authenticity, support, truth, standing, admission, or verification state.

Source Atlas capture occurrences: 1

Source Family

Secondary:
None authored

Organizations

Admitted records citing this source

Each card below is an admitted record that anchors at least one citation span to this source. The per-card list names the record-local span ids and renders the verification state recorded on each span. Documentary associations are a separate relation and are listed under “Associated entries” below.

Entries carrying this source

Each entry below carries a source reference that resolves to this Source Record. Carrying a reference is not citation support, verification, or a documentary association.

Technical traversal

Fixture-backed links across the rendered public artifacts. This panel is read-only and does not imply a live graph, search index, backend lookup, or verification action. Profile posture: cross-artifact traversal links shown.