Assessment
The NTSB's initial report described the vent-and-burn as a response to a feared polymerization hazard. Its corrected final investigation later concluded polymerization was not occurring before the vent and burn and the operation was not necessary to prevent a polymerization-induced tank rupture. These are different assessments at different stages, not conflicting editions of one NTSB document.123
What the preliminary report recorded
The February 23, 2023 preliminary report recorded the feared hazard and the response while the investigation remained open. It was not a Board finding that the procedure was necessary.45
What the later Board finding changed
The NTSB's corrected final report RIR-24-05 found no polymerization in the five tank cars before the vent and burn and concluded the vent-and-burn was unnecessary to prevent a polymerization-induced rupture. It also reported that the incident commander had not received the shipper's contrary technical opinion before the decision. A retrospective physical finding is not proof that responders had that knowledge in real time.678
Technical details
- record id
- EAST-PALESTINE-ASSESSMENT-0001
- current edition
- EAST-PALESTINE-ASSESSMENT-0001:edition:2