CounterpediaExplore knowledge. Follow the sources.

Receipt & verification

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Order and Amended Opinion, United States v. Holmes and Balwani (Captured Public Document)

Version TH-S09@TH-S09-ED-0001

Verification checks independently-checkable properties (cryptographic integrity, schema conformance, source availability) at the pinned version. It does not guarantee currentness, and it does not adjudicate the truth of the underlying allegation.

Each property below is shown separately with its own state. There is no single overall pass/fail: integrity, schema conformance and binding are checkable, currentness is never established, and the truth of the underlying allegation is not adjudicated at all.

What is being verified on this page

  1. Counterpedia read envelope — schema conformance, subject/version binding, and supersession state of the counterpedia.read_api v1 envelope for TH-S09.
  2. Publication SRS evidence — cryptographic integrity properties from any committed ARCS Verify report against the Counterpose publication artifact.(No committed verification report for this record: cryptographic integrity is not available to check.)
  3. Source-capture SRS evidence — publisher-declared references and their capture posture in the governed sources surface. SRS source-capture receipts are separate from the publication-ingest evidence chain above.

These are three separate evidence chains. Presence in one chain does not imply presence in another.

Download machine-readable receipt (JSON) →

Permalink to this record + version receipt

← Back to the record

Raw evidence

The verifier output and source declarations are preserved verbatim below. Nothing on this page replaces the committed bytes.

Committed report conclusions — No committed verification report conclusions are attached to this record. The cryptographic integrity dimension above reflects this absence.
Raw verification envelope (C2 read API)
{
  "schema_family": "counterpedia.read_api",
  "schema_version": 3,
  "surface": "verification",
  "status": "ok",
  "record_ref": {
    "record_id": "TH-S09",
    "version_ref": "TH-S09@TH-S09-ED-0001",
    "canonical_url": "/records/TH-S09",
    "surfaces": [
      {
        "surface": "record",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09"
      },
      {
        "surface": "sources",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/sources"
      },
      {
        "surface": "exclusions",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/exclusions"
      },
      {
        "surface": "history",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/history"
      },
      {
        "surface": "verification",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/verification"
      }
    ],
    "admission_event_id": "ADM-EVT-public:TH-S09-0001",
    "basis_version_ref": "counterpedia:record:TH-S09@ADM-EVT-public:TH-S09-0001",
    "basis_snapshot_digest": "sha256:16b7c6248f983c33a25af15d30c954c0ace1ff1b8ab6c49a0f0cca8dbd823580"
  },
  "elements": [
    {
      "kind": "current_projection",
      "element_id": "TH-S09@TH-S09-ED-0001#current",
      "label": "Current projected version",
      "data": {
        "standing": "current",
        "record_id": "TH-S09",
        "version_ref": "TH-S09@TH-S09-ED-0001",
        "current_edition": "TH-S09-ED-0001",
        "edition_number": 1,
        "released_at": "2026-08-19T00:00:00Z",
        "status": "active",
        "corpus_lifecycle": "admitted",
        "anchor_resolution_status": "not_applicable",
        "title": "U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit — Order and Amended Opinion, United States v. Holmes and Balwani (Captured Public Document)",
        "subtitle": "A read-only presentation of an independently captured public federal appellate opinion. Counterpedia presents the captured artifact and its provenance chain; it does not restate the opinion's holdings as findings and asserts nothing beyond what the provenance record carries."
      }
    }
  ],
  "verification_status": {
    "independently_checkable": [],
    "not_guaranteed": [
      "currentness — the declared checks describe the record at version_ref; they do not establish that this is the current or latest state of the underlying matter."
    ],
    "not_adjudicated": [
      "truth of the underlying allegation — verification does not determine whether the record's claims are true.",
      "admission into the atlas is a custody and inclusion event, not a determination of truth."
    ],
    "report_conclusions": [],
    "boundary_statement": "Verification checks independently-checkable properties (cryptographic integrity, schema conformance, source availability) at the pinned version. It does not guarantee currentness, and it does not adjudicate the truth of the underlying allegation."
  },
  "notes": [
    "No committed verification report is attached to this record, so no independently-checkable property is declared here."
  ],
  "projection_kind": "demonstration_projection",
  "standing": "current"
}
Raw sources envelope (C2 read API)
{
  "schema_family": "counterpedia.read_api",
  "schema_version": 3,
  "surface": "sources",
  "status": "ok",
  "record_ref": {
    "record_id": "TH-S09",
    "version_ref": "TH-S09@TH-S09-ED-0001",
    "canonical_url": "/records/TH-S09",
    "surfaces": [
      {
        "surface": "record",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09"
      },
      {
        "surface": "sources",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/sources"
      },
      {
        "surface": "exclusions",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/exclusions"
      },
      {
        "surface": "history",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/history"
      },
      {
        "surface": "verification",
        "href": "/api/records/TH-S09/verification"
      }
    ],
    "admission_event_id": "ADM-EVT-public:TH-S09-0001",
    "basis_version_ref": "counterpedia:record:TH-S09@ADM-EVT-public:TH-S09-0001",
    "basis_snapshot_digest": "sha256:16b7c6248f983c33a25af15d30c954c0ace1ff1b8ab6c49a0f0cca8dbd823580"
  },
  "elements": [
    {
      "kind": "source_material",
      "element_id": "TH-S09#source:TH-S09-SRC-0001",
      "label": "Ninth Circuit Order and Amended Opinion (captured public document)",
      "data": {
        "source_id": "TH-S09-SRC-0001",
        "slug": "ninth-circuit-amended-opinion-capture",
        "source_type": "filing",
        "publication_status": "public",
        "span_ids": [
          "TH-S09-SPAN-0001"
        ],
        "capture_hash": "sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee",
        "capture_integrity": {
          "capture_referent": {
            "referent_id": "urn:counterpedia.source-reference:sha256:b503e976b57ed9c674c8ba263268c2dbb39afc96247de2d9186a5fe754b93fee:TH-S09",
            "referent_kind": "external_document",
            "referent_note": "Captured via counterpedia-acquisition HttpFetcher (arcs-amnesiac PR #124). ARCS Verify full_artifact_chain.v0_1 passed; authenticity_verified and signature_verified are not_evaluated per arcs-verify design. Bytes: 360184."
          },
          "integrity_class": "captured_bytes"
        },
        "description": "Independently captured public appellate opinion issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Presented as a provenance artifact; not quoted verbatim."
      }
    }
  ],
  "notes": [],
  "projection_kind": "demonstration_projection",
  "standing": "current"
}